Menu

The term “best interests of the child” is frequently used in family law — this is the principle that guides judges in every case involving child custody. Although courts prefer that both parents are equally involved in a child’s life, regardless of marital status, this may not always be what is best for the child. Importantly, in situations where there is a dispute concerning parenting time or custody, a judge would look at a number of factors to make a determination about what is right for the child’s well-being.
Whether you are facing a child custody matter, a parenting time issue in connection with divorce, or a child support dispute, Maryland courts will apply the legal standard the “best interests of the child” to decide the case. Ultimately, this means putting the child’s interests first and foremost. The best interests standard evaluates parental fitness — and ensures that parenting time decisions are made that promote the child’s wellbeing, health, safety, and happiness.
Every family’s situation is unique, and courts in Maryland decide child custody matters on a case-by-case basis. In an initial custody case, parents begin on equal footing under the law — neither is presumed to have a greater right to custody than the other. While courts in Maryland previously decided custody matters based solely on case law precedent, a new rule went into effect in December 2019 that codifies the factors a court should analyze.
Maryland Rule 9-204.1 outlines the key factors that a judge may consider when determining what decision-making authority and parenting time arrangement is in the best interests of the child. Under the statute, a judge can evaluate the following in a contested custody matter:
Judges in Maryland child custody matters have broad discretion when making decisions. In addition to the above, they would also consider any other factors they deem relevant, including their assessment of the parents’ credibility and demeanor during the trial. However, it’s essential to understand that no single factor is determinative. A judge would look at the full picture to decide what is in the best interests of the child.
The court doesn’t need to decide custody and determine what is in the best interests of your child. Specifically, a judge will only determine these matters if your case is contested and you and your co-parent cannot reach an agreed settlement. Significantly, you and your co-parent know your child better than anyone and are free to decide what is best for them. Courts generally prefer that parents make their own custody decisions. If you and your co-parent can reach an amicable agreement, it can be submitted to the court to become a binding order.
Mediation can help you and your co-parent achieve a settlement in custody matters by offering a safe environment to discuss your concerns and objectives. While the litigation process is adversarial, mediation gives parents the opportunity to work together with a neutral third party to find creative solutions that might not otherwise be available in the courtroom. Rather than focus on a contentious court battle, mediation allows you to focus on prioritizing your child’s needs — and ensuring their best interests are met.
If you are facing a child custody issue, it’s vital to have a knowledgeable family law attorney by your side who can advise you and ensure your parental rights are safeguarded. At Strickler, Platnik & Hatfield, we are committed to assisting our clients with achieving positive outcomes in their custody matters and finding solutions that meet the best interests of their children. To learn more about child custody in Maryland, contact Strickler, Platnick & Hatfield to schedule a consultation.
© 2025 Strickler, Platnick & Hatfield, P.C.
Legal Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
Law Firm Website Design by The Modern Firm